CONFEDERATION SOUGHT THE
INTERVENTION OF COMRADE BASUDEV ACHARYA M.P TO OPPOSE GOVERNMENT MOVE TO REJECT
ARBITRATION AWARDS IN PARLIAMENT
GOVERNMENT IS
MOVING AHEAD TO REJECT SOME ARBITRATION AWARDS
BY TAKING THEM TO
PARLIAMENT IN THE SHAPE OF RESOLUTIONS
ARBITRATION AWARDS ON
TRANSPORT ALLOWANCE AND HOUSE RENT ALLOWANCE
ARE BEING TAKEN TO
PARLIAMENT
CONFEDERATION SEEKS
THE SUPPORT OF COMRADE BASUDEV ACHARYA M.P TO OPPOSE THE RESOLUTIONS
CONFEDERATION LETTER
TO COMRADE BASUDEV ACHARYA IS PLACED HEREUNDER
CONFEDERATION OF CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES AND WORKERS
Manishinath Bhawan
A2/95 Rajourigarden
New Delhi-10027
website: confederationhq.blogspot. com.
e mail: confederation06@yahoo.co.in
Conf/ 14/2012 Dated: 29th November,
2012-11-29
Dear Comrade,
Kindly
refer to the Lok Sabha Bulletin Part II Nos. 4687-4695 Wednesday, November, 21
2012 and the discussion your office had with us in the matter The
Government has proposed to move two resolutions i.e. No. 4693 and
4694. As desired by you we send herewith the draft of the counter
resolution to be moved by you in the matter.
Against
Resolution No. 4693: Text
of the Counter resolution.
From whom received. Ministry
concerened.
Shri Basudeb Acharya. Finance. This
house disapproves the proposal of the Government to reject the award given on
24th November, 2005 by the Board of Arbitration in CA Reference
case No. 3 of 2004 regarding revision of rates of transport allowance to the
Central Government employees as the expenditure to be incurred is not going to
be Rs. 1232 crores. The increased allowance is to be given for
only two months i.e. November, 2005 and December, 2005 as Transport allowance
at much higher rates has already been paid from 1.1.2006 onwards.
Against
Resolution No.
4694. Text
of the Counter resolution.
Shri Basudeb Acharya. Finance This
house disapproves the proposal of the Government to reject the award given on
6.4.2004 by the Board of Arbitration in CA reference case No. 2 of 2002
regarding grant of house rent allowance to the Central Government employees for
the period from 1.1.2996 to 31.7.1997 at pre revised rates but with
reference to revised pay. This is only a one time expenditure for
the period of 19 months and logically to be related to the revised pay as was
obtaining at the relevant point of time. Since this expenditure will
be met from the savings in the Budget under the head Salaries no diversion of
any funds are to take place.
With
greetings,
Yours
fraternally,
K.K.N.
Kutty
Secretary
General